TMC PULSE

Vol. 36/No.9

Issue link: https://tmcpulse.uberflip.com/i/339692

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 28 of 39

t m c » p u l s e | j u ly 2 0 1 4 27 T o get people talking about ethics, often the issues have to be right in front of them. They have to have context. That is the thought behind the Bioethics on Stage series presented by Baylor College of Medicine's Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy. Written by psychologist and bioeth- icist Lynn W. Bush, and law professor and bioethicist Karen H. Rothernberg, the play engages the audience in a scenario in which a family deals with clinical research trials, and the disclo- sure of genetic testing findings. The event is designed to get people from all walks of life thinking, and talking, about the ethics of research and medicine in a unique way. Baylor's Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy Director and Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics Amy McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., nar- rated the play, encouraging audience members to think through the scenar- ios from the perspective of a patient deciding whether to take part in clinical testing. She hopes this play will serve as the first of many opportunities for the medical community and the general public to come together around conver- sations that take place within the Texas Medical Center and homes across the country, every day. "This play raises issues around clinical trial research participation, and some of the issues associated with that, including the decision making that goes into designing an ethical research protocol, and the participa- tion by individuals and families," said McGuire. "And this particular research study involves genetic testing, so it raises a lot of issues around decisions about genetic testing, the kinds of information you can get back from new genomic technologies that are being used, and how to communicate that information to family members." The play opened with a single mother and her three children visiting An Evening of Ethics and Art Geneticists and ethicists gather to spark conversation around clinical studies and patient consent B y A m a n d a D . S t e i n (Credit: Baylor College of Medicine) This play raises issues around clinical trial research participation, and some of the issues asso- ciated with that, including the decision making that goes into designing an ethical research protocol, and the participation by individuals and families. — AMY MCGUIRE, J.D., PH.D. Director of Baylor College of Medicine's Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy a pediatric genetic clinic. Two of the three children, nineteen-year-old Bobby and sixteen-year-old Amy, have an autosomal recessive genetic disorder, and the family was offered a chance to take part in a clinical study. The conver- sations that followed centered around the consent form, and the kinds of questions and conflicts a family might face related to genetic testing. The first act, titled "It's Not That Simple," includes a scene where the family is reading through the consent form sent home with them by Dr. Hardy, played by Lorraine Potocki, M.D., FACMG, professor of molecular and human genetics at Baylor. "The form goes on to say, 'In the future, we may contact you to find out if you are interested in learning about your results or gene variants that are important to your health and/or the health of your relatives,'" said Amy, played by Doe Florsheim, president of The Partnership for Baylor College of Medicine. "They say 'important,' but how will they decide what's really important enough to tell us?" replied Bobby, played by Robert Robbins, M.D., presi- dent of the Texas Medical Center. The audience engaged in conver- sations around that very idea during the first discussion portion of the play. Geneticists, physicians and members of the general public weighed in on what the family could or should expect in the way of privacy, consent of health information for children, and the desperation that might drive families to take part in clinical trials without really understanding what the outcome could be. Would a family risk finding out more than they want to know about their own health, for the chance to find a treatment or cure for a particular health problem they face every day? One audience member suggested that in cases where genetic testing holds promise for a treatment or cure, families and individuals may be quick to sign a document like the consent forms presented in the play. A genet- icist in the audience suggested that even families in desperate situations might give more thought to the forms than some would expect. She noted that many of her patients' families, facing pediatric cancer, request time to go over the forms and discuss their options. The play's second act, titled "It's So Complicated," includes a scene in which the family is told of "some poten- tially significant findings unrelated to what [they] were looking for." The mom, played by Melanie Gray, a partner at Winston and Strawn LLP and a Baylor board member, is advised to seek further testing from a neurologist, for the possibility of early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Bobby is told that he carries the BRCA mutation, giving him a six percent lifetime risk for devel- oping breast cancer. And the youngest and "healthiest" son of the family, Sam, played by Reid Sutton, M.D., associate professor of molecular and human genetics at Baylor, is told he must quit the swim team because of a genetic predisposition to Long QT syndrome. The scene sparked conversations about a doctor's role in carefully and completely explaining the findings of these types of genetic tests, and not rushing into a diagnosis. Some also questioned the current practice of "all or nothing" disclosure of significant health findings from genetic testing.

Articles in this issue

view archives of TMC PULSE - Vol. 36/No.9